Acute stroke in patients taking an oral anticoagulant: impact of clinical pharmacist's intervention on pharmacovigilance reporting.

INTRODUCTION: Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke can occur to patients treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC), through lack of effectiveness or overdosing. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist's intervention on pharmacovigilance (PV) reporting for OAC-treated patients hospitalized for stroke. METHODS: Monocentric prospective study in which a clinical pharmacist's intervention was performed in a stroke unit, with a focus on patients treated by OAC prior admission. A PV report was made with all data collected for cases of stroke suspected to be related to OAC therapy. Data provided by pharmacist were compared with data initially available in the patient's electronic medical records. PV reports with pharmacist intervention were compared to those without. RESULTS: During the study period, 48 patients were included in the study: 43 (89.6%) ischemic strokes with an embolic or unknown etiology, four hemorrhage strokes (8.33%), and one medication error (2.08%). A clinical pharmacist intervention was performed for 19 patients (39.6%) and provided significant additional data in all of them (100%). The information was related to adherence to treatment for 17 cases (89.5%), OAC's initial prescription date for 11 cases (57.9%) and identifying event(s) that could have interfered with the efficacy of the OAC in five cases (26.3%). For patients with pharmacist intervention, PV reports were significantly more informative in terms of date's introduction of anticoagulant, adherence to treatment, reference to weight change or concomitant event. CONCLUSIONS: clinical pharmacist's intervention with patients taking oral anticoagulants and hospitalized for acute stroke contributes to collect high-quality data for pharmacovigilance reporting.

Drug-related hypophosphatemia: Descriptive study and case/non-case analysis of the French national pharmacovigilance database.

Phosphorus is an essential element for all living organisms and is involved in various biological pathways. A severe hypophosphatemia can lead to serious complications (acute heart or respiratory failure, rhabdomyolysis, hemolysis…) and increases mortality in patients at risk. Various drugs are known to induce hypophosphatemia through various mechanisms. The aim of this study was to highlight the main drugs associated with hypophosphatemia and to deduce the underlying mechanisms based on a descriptive analysis and a case/non-case analysis using the cases of drug-induced hypophosphatemia reported to the French Pharmacovigilance Network. A total of 368 cases of hypophosphatemia were included in the study. Patients' mean age was 52±18 years. One hundred and ninety-one cases (52%) were serious including 131 (36%) hospitalizations. The median value of serum phosphorus level was 0.54mmol/L [0.40-0.66] (n=309). Those 368 cases corresponded to 185 different suspected substances among which the most frequent drugs were tenofovir disoproxil (n=175; 48%), ferric carboxymaltose (n=29; 8%), denosumab (n=16; 4%), zoledronic acid (n=14; 4%) and hydrochlorothiazide (n=10; 3%). For these five drugs, a significant disproportionality was found. Tenofovir-disoproxil related hypophosphatemia occurred more than one year after its introduction, and a renal tubulopathy (Fanconi's syndrome) was reported in 44 cases (25%). Hypophosphatemia related to iron carboxymaltose occurred within a median of 20 days after injection and was mostly severe. Mechanism included the fibroblast growth factor 23 which can be measured to confirm drug origin. Concerning anti-osteoporosis treatments, hypophosphatemia could be explained by their mechanism of action (abrupt increase of parathormone induced by hypocalcemia) but the patient history (malignancy condition) was a major bias. For hydrochlorothiazide, hyphosphatemia was often moderate, associated with other electrolytic disturbances and occurred during a long-term treatment. Awareness of healthcare professionals is essential to detect as soon as possible hypophosphatemia and its complications related to these drugs.

Peripheral facial palsy post SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: A regional pharmacovigilance cases series.

Peripheral facial palsy (PFP) is a rare adverse reaction identified from clinical trials of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines (messenger ribonucleic acid [mRNA] and viral vector). Few data are available on their onset patterns and risk of recurrence after re-injection of a COVID-19 vaccine; the objective of this study was to describe PFP cases attributed to COVID-19 vaccines. All cases of facial paralysis reported to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Centre-Val de Loire area between January and October 2021, in which the role of a COVID-19 vaccine was suspected, were selected. Based on initial data and following additional information requested, each case was reviewed and analyzed to include only confirmed cases of PFP for which the role of the vaccine could be retained. From the 38 cases reported, 23 were included (15 excluded because of diagnosis not retained). They occurred in 12 men and 11 women (median age of 51 years). The first clinical manifestations occurred with a median time of 9 days after COVID-19 vaccine injection, and the paralysis was homolateral to the vaccinated arm in 70%. The etiological workup, always negative, included brain imaging (48%), infectious serologies (74%) and Covid-19 PCR (52%). Corticosteroid therapy was prescribed for 20 (87%) patients, combined with aciclovir in 12 (52%). At 4-month follow-up, clinical manifestations had regressed completely or partially in 20 (87%) of the 23 patients (median time of 30 days). From them 12 (60%) received another dose of COVID-19 vaccine and none had a recurrence and the PFP regressed despite the second dose in 2 of the 3 patients not fully recovered at 4 months. The potential mechanism of PFP after COVID-19 vaccine, which don't have a specific profile, is probably the interferon-γ. Moreover, the risk of recurrence after a new injection appears to be very low, which makes it possible to continue the vaccination.

Sex differences in adverse drug reactions: Are women more impacted?

Pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology studies regarding the sex difference in adverse drug reactions are numerous, and it is now a challenge to take them into account in order to increase drug safety. Here, we present an overview of this topic through data on epidemiology, mechanisms, and methods used for assessing sex differences in drug safety. Because the literature is extensive, we choose to expose a few examples of studies for cardiovascular drugs, anti-infectious, psychotropics, antidiabetics, anticancer drugs and some specific drugs to illustrate our purpose. Many studies show a higher risk in women for most of drugs involving in sex differences. However, physiological, methodological and subjective points have to be taken into account to interpret these results. Clinical trials must also enroll more women to better evaluate sex differences both in efficacy and pharmacovigilance. Nevertheless, when there is a pharmacological rationale underlying the observed association between sex and drug safety profile, it is now unavoidable to think about its consideration for a personalized prescription.

When to investigate for secondary hyperhidrosis: data from a retrospective cohort of all causes of recurrent sweating.

Background: Identification of underlying diseases is crucial for secondary hyperhidrosis management, but data are lacking to guide appropriate investigation.Objective: To describe aetiologies of recurrent sweating in a hospital setting and the diagnostic performance parameters of their respective clinical/biological features.Patients and Methods: We performed a monocentric evaluative study in a tertiary care centre. Patients with recurrent generalised sweating were selected via the Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) by screening all electronic hospital documents from the year 2018 using a keyword-based algorithm. All in and out-patients aged ≥ 18 years having reported recurrent sweating for at least 2 weeks in 2018 were included, with a minimum one-year follow-up after symptoms' onset.Results: A total of 420 patients were included. Over 130 different aetiologies were identified; 70 patients (16.7%) remained without diagnosis. Solid organ cancers (14.3% with 13 lung cancers), haematologic malignancies (14.0% with 35 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas) and Infectious Diseases (10.5% including 13 tuberculosis) were the most frequent diagnoses. Other aetiologies were gathered into inflammatory (16.9%) and non-inflammatory (27.6%) conditions. To distinguish non-inflammatory and undiagnosed hyperhidrosis from other causes, fever had a specificity of 94%, impaired general condition a sensitivity of 78%, and C-reactive protein (CRP) > 5.6 mg/l a positive predictive value of 0.86. Symptoms' duration over 1 year was in favour of non-infectious and non-malignant causes (94% specificity).Conclusions: We identified fever, impaired general condition, duration, and CRP as helpful orientation parameters to assess the need for complementary explorations for hyperhidrosis. The study provides a diagnostic algorithm for the investigation of recurrent sweating.KEY MESSAGESIn a hospital setting, malignancies and infections are the most frequently associated diseases, but 1/5 remain without diagnosis.Fever is a specific but not sensitive sign to distinguish inflammatory conditions.Over 1 year duration of symptoms significantly reduce the probability of malignancy or infection as the underlying diagnosis.

De novo and relapsing necrotizing vasculitis after COVID-19 vaccination.

We describe five cases of severe necrotizing vasculitis following the RNA-based vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including four relapsing anti neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) vasculitis, 27 days (1-60) after vaccination and one patient with quiescent chronic hepatitis B and de novo polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) 21 days after vaccination. Ten other cases were reported to the French national pharmacovigilance database: six patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and four patients with PAN (first symptoms 19 days on average after vaccination). Five of these 10 patients developed kidney dysfunction. In conclusion, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines can be associated with de novo or recurrent ANCA vasculitis or PAN. Attention should be paid to patients with known ANCA vasculitis or patients with a history of hepatitis B infection.

Psychiatric Adverse Events Associated With Infliximab: A Cohort Study From the French Nationwide Discharge Abstract Database.

INTRODUCTION: Infliximab (IFX) was the first anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNFα) antibody to be used in the treatment of severe chronic inflammatory diseases, such as Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. A number of serious adverse drug reactions are known to be associated with IFX use; they include infections, malignancies, and injection site reactions. Although a few case reports have described potential psychiatric adverse events (including suicide attempts and manic episodes), the latter are barely mentioned in IFX's summary of product characteristics. The objective of the present retrospective study was to detect potential psychiatric adverse events associated with IFX treatment by analyzing a national discharge abstract database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an historical cohort study by analyzing data from the French national hospital discharge abstract database (PMSI) between 2008 and 2014. All patients admitted with one of the five diseases treated with IFX were included. RESULTS: Of the 325,319 patients included in the study, 7,600 had been treated with IFX. The proportion of hospital admissions for one or more psychiatric events was higher among IFX-exposed patients (750 out of 7,600; 9.87%) than among non-exposed patients (17,456 out of 317,719; 5.49%). After taking account of potential confounders in the cohort as a whole, a semi-parametric Cox regression analysis gave an overall hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval] (CI) of 4.5 [3.95; 5.13] for a hospital admission with a psychiatric adverse event during treatment with IFX. The HR (95%CI) for a depressive disorder was 4.97 (7.35; 6.68). Even higher risks were observed for certain pairs of adverse events and underlying pathologies: psychotic disorders in patients treated for ulcerative colitis (HR = 5.43 [2.01; 14.6]), manic episodes in patients treated for severe psoriasis (HR = 12.6 [4.65; 34.2]), and suicide attempts in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis (HR = 4.45 [1.11; 17.9]). DISCUSSION: The present retrospective, observational study confirmed that IFX treatment is associated with an elevated risk of psychiatric adverse events. Depending on the disease treated, physicians should be aware of these potential adverse events.